Opinion | ‘Peer-to-Peer’ Wagering Isn’t Gambling? Don’t Bet on It
WSJ.com: Markets
12 lis 2026, 20:54The Wall Street Journal
1 min read
Utah disputes Kalshi's claim that its peer-to-peer wagering differs from gambling, citing the company's trading arm acting like the house.
Utah has challenged Kalshi's assertion that its peer-to-peer wagering platform differs from traditional gambling, arguing that the company's trading arm effectively operates as the house.
Classification Dispute
The company maintains its model is distinct from sportsbooks, while Utah regulators point to Kalshi's trading activities that mirror conventional gambling operations.
Related
Article written by AI
Z.ai GLM-4.5-FlashFree